Why Satoshi Nakamoto’s Bitcoin Wallets Can’t Be Unlocked With 24 Words

Nakamoto’s final public message on Dec. 12, 2010, addressed denial-of-service vulnerabilities in Bitcoin’s software, marking the end of their involvement long before mnemonic phrases became a feature. As a result, applying BIP39 retroactively to Satoshi’s wallets misrepresents the technology’s timeline and applicability. Basically, early versions of Bitcoin software, used by Satoshi, generated raw private keys—256-bit numbers represented in hexadecimal or other formats—without the user-friendly mnemonic conversion introduced later.

These keys were stored directly in wallet files, requiring exact knowledge or possession to access funds, rather than derivable word lists. Satoshi’s addresses, identified through blockchain analysis, hold coins from the genesis block onward, but no modern seed phrase could reconstruct them because the underlying generation method predates BIP39 by years. This historical disconnect means that even if someone possessed a hypothetical 24-word phrase, it would not interface with the original key structure.

Source: Arkham Intelligence on Nov. 12, 2025.

Blockchain explorers like Blockchair, mempool.space, or Arkham confirm the dormancy of these addresses, with no outgoing transactions recorded in 2025 or prior years, which essentially highlights the irrelevance of mnemonic-based attacks. Even if Satoshi’s keys aligned with contemporary standards, or anyone’s for that matter, brute-forcing a 256-bit private key remains mathematically infeasible, with 2^256 possible combinations equaling approximately 1.1579 x 10^77 unique possibilities. Try out “Mnemonic Slots” for yourself here.

You will not win the lottery. This is because the unique possibilities figure dwarfs the estimated 10^78 to 10^82 atoms in the observable universe, often cited as around 10^80, making random guessing equivalent to searching for a specific atom across cosmic scales. Current global computing power, even at 10^21 operations per second, would require an average of 1.8 x 10^48 years to crack such a key—vastly exceeding the universe’s 13.8 billion-year age.

Social media posts often invoke this “scare factor” for engagement, but they overlook that proper key management renders such attacks theoretical at best. Public blockchain data provides irrefutable evidence against any successful access attempts, as all transactions are transparently recorded and monitored by services like blockchain explorers and full nodes.

These persistent myths highlight broader cryptocurrency education gaps, where simplified narratives on platforms like X amplify fears without validity or context, even as bitcoin’s design ensures long-term security through cryptographic principles established in 2009. The engagement shows—While the misinformed X post received more than 1,200 likes, Thorn’s reply only hit 389, and Sani’s saw around 77.

FAQ ❓

• When was the BIP39 standard for mnemonic seed phrases introduced? The BIP39 standard was proposed on Sept. 10, 2013, standardizing word-based recovery for Bitcoin wallets.
• What type of keys did Satoshi Nakamoto use in early Bitcoin? Satoshi used raw 256-bit private keys generated by early Bitcoin software, not mnemonic word phrases.
• How many possible combinations exist for a 256-bit encryption key? A 256-bit key has 2^256 combinations, or about 1.1579 x 10^77 possibilities.
• Has Satoshi Nakamoto’s wallets shown any activity in 2025? No transactions have occurred from Satoshi’s estimated addresses in 2025, per public blockchain data.

Source