Don’t fear the FDV: How real revenue creates sustainable value | Opinion

Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial.

If you’ve been in crypto for more than a week, you know the story. A new project launches with a minimal active float. Yet, it immediately commands a market perception of immense, long-term scale, a vast pool of future ownership waiting to enter circulation. For the average investor, this phenomenon has become a serious concern, often signaling a structural overhang of future supply that threatens the immediate health of the asset.

Summary

• When a project has real revenue, strong value-capture, and broad community ownership, a high initial valuation becomes sustainable rather than a liability.
• Buyback-and-burn creates alignment: Continuous buybacks funded by real fees and permanent burns counter dilution, generate lasting demand, and tie token strength directly to protocol performance.
• When backed by an actual product and revenue engine, large airdrops decentralize control, create committed stakeholders, and reinforce a long-term, community-aligned economic flywheel.

This legacy model, where initial ownership is heavily concentrated, has rightfully earned a bad reputation. But what if we’ve been pointing the finger at the wrong culprit? What if the high valuation isn’t the problem, but merely a symptom of an incomplete economic design?

You might also like: Agentic finance will dismantle Wall Street’s last monopoly | Opinion

A new, more sustainable paradigm is emerging, proving that a high valuation at launch can be a feature, not a flaw. This model is built on a powerful, self-reinforcing flywheel, and it’s incredibly beneficial for the community. It requires three non-negotiable pillars:

1. A revenue-efficient product with real, intrinsic utility.
2. An aggressive, non-stop value-capture mechanism fueled by that revenue.
3. A large-scale, strategic distribution of ownership to the community.

When these three elements work in concert, the structural valuation transforms from a perceived liability into a robust mechanism for sustained ecosystem growth and community alignment.

A case study

The best proof of concept for this blueprint is Hyperliquid. When they launched their token, the market immediately priced in their potential at a significantly high valuation. Under the old model, this would have been a death sentence, with the sheer size of the future supply overwhelming the price.

However, Hyperliquid succeeded because its product, a high-throughput, innovative perpetual exchange, was already generating massive, real-time transaction fees. This revenue efficiency meant that their internal economic engine was firing on all cylinders from day one.

In this scenario, the market’s high valuation was not a speculative bet but a credible reflection of the velocity of their business model. The ongoing, verifiable fee generation provided the necessary fuel to neutralize the future supply overhang and initiate the buyback program, ensuring the token’s long-term sustainability was rooted in financial performance, not just hype.

Buyback & burn is a pact with the community

The true magic of this model lies in the buyback and burn mechanism (or equivalent value capture). It is the most direct and potent antidote to the dilution that plagues typical structural launches. It’s a transparent, on-chain promise that the protocol’s success will directly and perpetually benefit its token holders.

Here’s how this powerful engine works:

The buyback: A constant wave of buy pressure

First, the protocol takes a significant portion of the real revenue it generates — from sources like trading fees paid in stablecoins or Ethereum (ETH) — and uses it to buy its own tokens from the open market systematically. This isn’t a one-off event announced in a blog post, but a constant, automated, and verifiable flow of capital creating buy pressure, day in and day out.

For the community, this is a game-changer. It means there is always a buyer in the market, acting as a floor of support and a direct counterforce to the selling pressure from token unlocks or market volatility. This mechanism directly links the protocol’s real-world performance to the token’s strength. More users and more activity mean more revenue, which in turn means more buybacks. This creates a powerful signal of confidence and financial health that rewards long-term believers.

The burn: Engineering permanent scarcity

The second step is what makes the model truly deflationary. The tokens that are bought back aren’t just held in a treasury. Instead, they are burned — sent to an unrecoverable address and permanently removed from the total supply.

This is an irreversible act of induced scarcity. With every single burn, the total number of tokens in existence shrinks, making the remaining tokens inherently more valuable. For a community member holding the token, this means their proportional ownership of the network actually increases over time. Their slice of the pie gets bigger because the pie itself is shrinking.

This combination of constant buy pressure and engineered deflation is the perfect alignment for a community. It’s a transparent social contract that ensures, as the protocol succeeds, the value is directly and verifiably returned to the token holders who support it.

The airdrop

This brings us to the final piece of the puzzle: the airdrop. Critics often ask, “Why distribute a large stake in a project with such a high structural valuation?” The answer is simple: you’re not just giving away “free money.” You are distributing ownership in a valuable, revenue-generating enterprise.

When a project has a working product with real intrinsic value, the airdrop is no longer a speculative marketing gimmick. It becomes a strategic distribution of equity to its earliest and most loyal users. This is great for the community for several key reasons:

• It creates stakeholders, not speculators
• It decentralizes ownership
• It aligns the community for the long term

A new blueprint for value

The structural valuation picture isn’t inherently flawed. It has just been poorly implemented. Without a real product generating sustainable economic output, it’s an empty promise. But when a project launches with a great product, a commitment to return value to its community through demonstrable mechanisms, and a strategy to distribute ownership to its most dedicated users, the high valuation becomes a credible reflection of its future potential and operational capability.

This is the blueprint for the next generation of blue-chip crypto projects. They understand that lasting value isn’t created by fleeting scarcity, but by building a real digital economy and ensuring the community that powers it shares directly in its success.

Read more: The missing language of mistakes in crypto discourse | Opinion

Source